Skip to main content

Alan Greenspan admits he is an idiot...

OK, maybe that is a bit of an exaggeration. But I keep saying it and I will say it again - NEO-LIBERALISM IS DEAD! Dead! Dead! Dead! Now one of it’s main ideologues, it’s key architects, is practically admitting so. Check out this video clip of Alan Greenspan’s testimony before The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last Thursday (warning, you may want to just listen to the audio, Alan Greenspan and Henry Waxman are quite possibly the two ugliest men alive - actually alive might be questinable in Greenspan's case)…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55-A1-D3MR0

Here is the New York Times report on the hearing…

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/24/business/economy/24panel.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

Oh, I only wish Milton Friedman was still alive so he could similarly grovel before the American people and the world.

Comments

  1. I wonder what Friedman would say too. The only plausible way to continue to defend neo-liberal economic policy is by opposing government bailouts. period. Thus creating a market-related punishment for acting fiscally irresponsible. But very few economists, if any, seriously suggest this because, based on the current financial systems every bank is linked through secret, unregulated credit swaps with no margin or collateral. So if one bank fails, it starts a domino effect that causes bank after bank to go into default. And if every, or nearly every, U.S. bank failed, the government probably couldn't even support the FDIC anymore.

    Another aspect of this is the degree to which many
    upper-middle, middle, and even many working-class families now have a stake in the U.S. financial and stock markets. And while their piece of the pie is considerably smaller as compared to the wealthiest 10% (miniscule, in fact) it could be argued that their respective risk is equal to, if not higher than, those with much greater wealth. I hear from so many people at my work who are really concerned about their 401ks and other mutual fund investments. These are not dabblers in the market. These are people who have put their faith - rightly or wrongly - in the power of the U.S. economy to secure, at least in part, their future. It's a gamble that's looking riskier in hindsight, but after about 60 years of more-or-less consistent growth its easy to see how most people felt pretty secure in their investments.

    It is interesting how the option for the government to buy preferred stock in these failing institutions was practically snuck into the financial bailout plan at the last minute, merely as a possible option for the Treasury to consider. And now it's looking like that is the soundest option for going forward, despite the shrieks of "socialism" coming from the right-wing. Maybe, in the end, banks really would rather be red than dead.

    (Or, more likely, they'll use this as a reprieve to shore up other financial institutions before letting these government-backed banks fail.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The occupation has ended but the struggle goes on…

The occupation of La Casita at Whittier was brought to a close tonight. The Whittier parents are declaring victory in the battle of La Casita as Ron Huberman’s office put in writing today the guarantee not to demolish the field house and to lease it to the parents group at $1 a year. However the war is far from over… The issue of the library is yet to be resolved. CPS still insists that they can find space inside the school building for the library. The parents insist there is no space in the school and that the library should be located in the field house. The parents insist that Huberman and Alderman Solis already agreed that TIF funds would be used to complete the repairs necessary at La Casita. Huberman’s letter today did not make this clear. A half block away from Whittier is the abandon police station on Damen which has sat vacant for several years. The parents say that Solis promised them that the build...

R.I.P. UAW…

OK, I realize those are harsh words, but I can’t help feeling real sadness today as I read reports of what the UAW agreed to in its settlement with GM. As I am sure you have all heard already, the strike was ended today (after just two days), with the announcement by Gettelfinger that a tentative agreement had been reached. The exact details of the agreement won’t be known till at least late this week, when the members vote to ratify (or not) the contract. You can listen to audio of Gettelfinger’s announcement here… http://www.uaw.org/ Now I am not saying we should relish the idea of a long strike. Strikes are always much harder on the individual worker than they are on their corporate bosses. No one wants a long drawn out strike that leads to workers losing their homes, pulling kids out of college, sinking deeper into debt, etc., etc., etc. Let me say right of the bat, even though I have been a labor activist for 15 years, I have never myself had to endure the pain of a strike. But I ...

Financial Crisis Brings Historic Opportunity…

www.whatnowtoons.com Wow, what a difference a few weeks can make. Less than a month ago, every mainstream mass media outlet, U.S. politician, economic analyst, and probably the majority of average citizens would still have been singing the praises of the unfettered free market. Regulation was still a dirty word and privatization was still equated with efficiency and prosperity. Granted, the sand had already begun to shift under this ideological edifice of 30+ years. The sub-prime mortgage crisis and the bursting of the housing bubble had seriously shaken the confidence of some in the system. I had mentioned repeatedly on Labor Express Radio over the Summer the glaring contrast between the soaring gas prices we experienced here in the laissez-faire fuel market of the U.S. as compared to the low and stable prices maintained by the state oil company of our neighbor to the south. But none of that seemed to really change the mainstream belief in this country that free markets solve all prob...