Sunday, November 30, 2008

Historic Moment! Historic Opportunity?...

Well I guess it is about time I respond to the historic Presidential election just passed. I guess three weeks is long enough to recover from election fatigue. Most of my free time in the past few months was devoted to the Omar Lopez campaign, a long time leader in the immigrant rights movement who ran for congress on the Green Party ticket here in Illinois’s 4th congressional district. The 4th encompasses Pilsen & La Vilita, as well has Humboldt Park and large stretches of the North side and west Suburbs. It is one of the countries most important Latino districts and has been represented by Luis Gutierrez for decades. Gutierrez’s support of anti-immigrant legislation such as the STRIVE Act and his less than principled stand on issues from relations with Cuba and Israel to de-regulation, finally created a backlash of which the Lopez campaign was one result. Sadly, the meager 8.3% of the vote that Omar received was quite disheartening as was the Green Party’s overall performance this year. It is a shame since there was definitely increased interest in the Green Party by Latinos who have felt demonized at worst and ignored at best by the Democrats & the Republicans (see Kari Lydersen’s article in the Chicago Reader for more… http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/greenparty/ ).

This year also saw a record number of Illinois Green candidates in local races receiving union support, especially down state. Unfortunately, the Obama juggernaut encouraged straight party line voting this year like never before, in a city that is already infamous for party line voting in past elections. The reality is that the Green Party is in organizational disarray. Compare the thousands who attended the 2004 convention in Milwaukee to the hundreds that made it to Chicago this past Summer. Again, this is rather unfortunate, as the time is ripe for the party to benefit from disaffected Democrats from the anti-war, immigrant rights and labor movements. This may become more important in two years, when the Democrats fail to come through on many of their promises and voters start to look for an alternative. If the Greens can’t get their act together by than, a right wing turn in the electorate may be inevitable.

But enough on the failures of the Green Party, this entry is supposed to be about the historic election of Barack Obama. And for certain, the historic milestone represented by Obama’s victory can not be ignored. I felt this in a very personal way. My adorable little 8 year old Mexican-American nephew Andres is a big Obama fan. So much so that in his own way he became an Obama campaigner, asking everyone he knew who they were voting for and encouraging them to vote for Obama. His excitement literally brought me to tears at one point. Here is this Mexican-American kid, the child of immigrants, in a community not often known for having the best attitude toward African-Americans, and Obama is his hero. How many other Latino, White, Asian as well as African-American kids feel the same way as Andres. The power of this is incalculable. Even as I write this I feel the emotion welling up within me. I am reminded of when I was 13 years old and Harold Washington was running for Mayor for the first time. I let it slip out on the playground at my all white Catholic school on Chicago’s far Northwest side that I liked Washington and faced weeks of ridicule and persecution because of it. The people in my neighborhood at the time saw the election of a black man as armageddon for our city. What a sea change. That a kid in a Latino neighborhood, or a white neighborhood could openly declare with pride his support of an African-American candidate for the highest office in the land and find mostly sympathy and support – that is as whole new world than the one I experienced as a child. Fear of blacks, fear of Communism, and fear of the ever present possibility of nuclear annihilation dominated the world of my youth - what a different, and at least in some ways, better world we live in today.

The first thing I did upon hearing the announcement that the Obama had won the election was to call my dad. I had one question for him – did you ever dream that you would vote for a black man for president? I already knew the answer. My father has always been a reliable barometer of the temperament of the white, male working class in the United States. A natural Democrat, a huge fan of Kennedy, my dad, along with many other white, working class, males switched to the dark side during the Regan years. One of the primary reasons for this was their deep seated racism. They were turned off by the New Left who had for good reason privileged race and gender over class. They simply did not understand the reality of life as a person of color in our society and interpreted every advance made by women and racial minorities as some how an attack on them. Remembering back to that first Harold Washington election I remember my father’s fear of Washington. This man who was for the most part, a life long Democrat, who had rarely participated in politics in any active sense, campaigned door-to-door in our neighborhood for Bernie Epton, Washington’s white Republican challenger in the general election. But as the reality of the right-wings efforts to drive the American working class into poverty became every more transparent during the administrations of Bush 41 and Bush 43, and during the Republican domination of the Congress in the Clinton years, my father’s innate class consciousness increasingly rose to the surface. His anger at the American ruling class overwhelming his distrust of blacks (an anger almost reactionary in intensity – he loves to argue that all Republicans should be strung up from light posts). Actually he has developed a deeper appreciation of the realities of race in America in recent years and he now regularly expresses sentiments of solidarity that I would never have imagined him uttering in the 80’s when we frequently butted heads over the issue. To see him enthusiastic about our first African-American president, is therefore a personal milestone.

I am also anxious to gauge what I expect will be a dramatically different attitude toward America as I travel abroad next Summer. I have become quite used to the pleasant surprise I would find when I apologized for the actions of the American government to the Europeans and Latin Americans I would meet during my travels. They always assume that most American’s share their government’s short sighted, unilateral, imperialistic approach to foreign policy and warm up to me quite quickly when they find that I reject U.S. actions abroad just as much if not more vehemently than they do. I imagine the dynamic will be radically different this time around. Indeed most reports indicate that Obama’s popularity in Europe, Africa, and Latin America exceeds his rankings in the U.S. Perhaps no other symbolic phenomenon of the election of an African-American to the presidency is stronger than the effect it will have on the image of the United States abroad. However, if Obama makes good on some of the foreign policy plans he outlined in his campaign, especially in regards to Iran & Afghanistan, this good will might be short lived.

So yes, this is an historic event – an event of epic importance and significance in many ways. But let’s get past all the exuberant self-congratulations and face the reality of our situation. Beyond the tremendous symbolic importance of this election, what concrete gains can or will come of the Obama presidency? This is a much more difficult and complicated issue to address. In many ways Barack Obama’s election may offer as many possible pitfalls and dangers are it does opportunities. So much rides on what we make of this election and how we mobilize to take advantage of the space created.

Obama’s Election & Racism in America:

The number one danger we face in the wake of Barack Obama’s election is the claim that America has overcome it’s history of racial oppression. Already many in the main stream media are making this claim. In many ways the events of this election cycle prove quite the reverse. This election would not be viewed by nearly everyone as historic if racism did not persist within our society. It is a bit like quite literally having a concept of black without a concept of white (or in a philosophic sense making sense of existence minus the concept on non-existence). The power of the election of a black man presupposes the widely hide view that such an event is so unlikely. And what about Barack Obama’s classification as African-American in the first place. What makes Barack black? He is as white as he is black. Born of a white mother, raised by white grandparents in a primarily white community, Barack’s classification as black could only come out of a racialized society. It is the product of a nation which for centuries carefully protected the boundaries of “whiteness”. In the state of Virgina in 1866 you needed to be a “quarter black” to be considered African-American. By 1910 that dropped to 1/16 and by 1924 the Virginia Racial Purity Act defined anyone with one drop of black blood African-American. By those standards, with some diligent research, I bet we could prove the majority of the American population is black. It is all about who decides, who determines these completely arbitrary racial categories. The day that Barack Obama can declare himself white if he so chooses and be accepted as such we can start to talk about the end of racism.

I am also intrigued that the mainstream media has spent little time investigating just how much race was still a significant factor in the ultimate vote count. Every poll conducted in recent months found that at least two thirds of the country wants an end to the war in Iraq, thinks the Republican party does not offer a way out of our current economic crisis and disapproves of nearly everything associated with the Bush administration. So why didn’t Barack Obama receive a landslide victory in the popular vote? Why the relatively narrow 53% to 46% split? Clearly a significant factor is the sad fact that many white democratic leaning voters, most of them working class, especially in places like West Virginia, Missouri, the deep south and white ethnic suburbs outside northern cities, just could not bring themselves to vote for a black man. Where just lucky that more working class whites than not decided to place their economic interest above racial concerns this time around. The AFL-CIO was clear aware of this danger. Sectary-Treasurer Rich Trumka made a similar speech to working class audiences at least a half dozen times, extolling union members to confront the racism of their fellow workers head on, least the election be lost (for a video of one of Trumka’s speeches, check out this link… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDDnJDsJD-0 ). MSNBC reported on a University of Texas poll conducted in late October that found 23% of Texans still thought Obama was Muslim, the implied understanding being that if this was true it would some how disqualify him as a candidate. Even when McCain rebuked a racist at one of his campaign rallies who “accused” Obama of being a Muslim, his response was that Obama was a “decent family man”, so I guess being Muslim is by McCain’s definition indecent.

But all of this really just touches the surface of the issue. What is really important here is not individual prejudices, even if shared by millions of white Americans, but the deep structural, institutional, racism which in many ways was only minimal effected by the gains of the civil rights movement. Dealing with surface racism is relatively easy, it is the institutional, structural change that is much more difficult achieve. Martin Luther King Jr. found this out when he attempt to build on his successes in the South by moving his campaign into northern cities like Chicago. Ultimately his efforts proved much less successful at defeating the poverty and exploitation of the urban, industrialized North where class structures and economic institutions rather than legal segregation was the barrier. When we discuss racism in its most profound and persistent form in the United States, we should always remember this most important fact – The median net worth of the average White household is 10 times greater than the median net worth of the typical black household. According to a 2003 U.S. Census Bureau report… “In 2000, the household median net worth was $79,400 for households with a non-Hispanic White householder, $7,500 for households with a Black householder, and $9,750 for households with a Hispanic householder.” (http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/p70-88.pdf this seems to be the most current data available). Net worth is more than just income, it includes a family’s total assets, minus debts, including the value of their homes and their bank accounts. It is our best indicator of the product of a history of racism because net worth also signifies accumulated wealth. The fact that African-Americans for most of our post-emancipation history were restricted to low paying jobs is a part of the explanation for this net worth gap for instances. It also reveals current racial disparities. For example, the higher property value of homes in white neighborhoods as compared to those in communities of color. And it shapes the future. That net worth gap will continue to affect the future opportunities of both families like access to higher education and better paying jobs. When income disparities between white, black and Latino wage earners vanish, when unemployment rates among each of these groups is equal, when educational achievement is balanced across the board, but most of all, when the net worth gap disappears, only than can we talk about racism being transcended. All indications are that our society as currently structured will make this highly unlikely for generations to come.

Obama’s Continual Shift to the Right:

Obama’s reputation is that of a progressive, a member of the Democratic party’s “left wing” rather than the Clintonite Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), “centrist” wing that dominated in the 90’s (I won’t even address the issue of how much left, right and center in American politics has little relationship to the traditional meaning of these terms). Some of this reputation stems from his history as a community organizer. This is the aspect of Obama I find most hopeful. But Obama’s rhetoric during the campaign and his choice of cabinet appointments so far, indicates quite the reverse. On the foreign policy front, in order to appease those who associate a strong foreign policy stand with get tough hawkish rhetoric, Obama seemed all to willing to argue for increased saber rattling and expansion of the Pax Americana, just not in Iraq (or at least not in Iraq after some future date of withdrawl). Earlier on in the campaign Obama seemed happy to threaten Iran with a bombing campaign if they were not to abandon their interests in becoming a nuclear power. Obama was also fond of suggesting the extension of a Bush like pre-emptive action against Pakistan if need be. Of course the most concerning aspect of Obama’s foreign policy plan is his repeated comment to step up the war in Afghanistan. At a time when increasing numbers of experts on the region are suggesting that the occupation of that country by NATO is causing more problems than it is solving, Obama seems determined to intensify this mistaken approach to one of the must brutalized people on the face of the planet.

Some of my greatest concerns in regards to Obama’s rightward drift have to do with Obama’s domestic policy agenda, the area in which some may argue Obama’s progressive credentials are most prominent. The best of example of this is perhaps the most important domestic policy issue Obama has pledge to address – reform of the U.S. health care system. The moment has never been so ripe in the last 30 years for the establishment a single payer, non-profit universal health care system in the United States. The legislation to do this is already to go. The Conyers Bill, H.R. 676, the Medicare for All Act, would not only end the anomaly of the United States being the only Western industrial nation without a universal health care system, but would go a long way to resolving underlying causes of the current economic crisis and the collapsing U.S. manufacturing base (especially the auto industry). One would expect that the nation’s so called “most liberal Senator” would have jumped on board with this legislation long ago. Instead, Obama continues to back a Mickey Mouse, convoluted, patch work approach to health care reform that leaves the bloated insurance industry bureaucracy in power and fails to guarantee universal coverage. The Obama plan turns the problem on its head in a sense. Rather than addressing this gigantic hole in the nation’s social safety net with a collective solution that makes health care a right, Obama seeks to make health care an individual responsibility (“individual mandates”) with minimal regard for ones economic circumstances. Individuals will need to seek out their own health care plans and make difficult choices about costs and coverage. By leaving the insurance industry in place, the Obama plan will do little to address mushrooming health care costs. It is estimated that over 30% of health care costs in our current system stem from administrative costs, mostly a product of the HMO industry. My understanding is that this does not even include the billions spent in advertising dollars. The system of employer funded health care will also continue, providing no relief to the industries and small business burdened with increasingly expensive employee health care plans. My greatest fear is that the Obama plan passes, millions remain an uncovered, tens of millions find the new health care bureaucracy difficult to navigate, and the costs of the system explode, leading to a popular backlash against the whole idea of national health care.

The “New New Deal” & the Cabinet:

(To be continued)…

For more info about Affordable Power...

Hi Labor Express listners,

For more on the Affordable Power to the People coalition, see the following website...

http://affordablepower.org/

San Francisco Labor Council statement on the Economic Crisis...

This was sent to me by Alan Benjamin, Executive Board Member of the San Francisco Labor Council...

RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH AN ECONOMIC CRISIS COMMITTEE
TO RECOMMEND TO THE San Francisco LABOR COUNCIL
A PROGRAM FOR ACTIONTO BE CONVEYED TO THE California Labor Federation and
the AFL-CIO & Change To Win

Whereas, On Monday, September 22, 2008, the San Francisco Labor Council Delegates adopted a "Resolution to U.S. Congress Demanding their Opposition to the Bailout of the Bad Debts of the Financial Industry."
Whereas, none of this Council's recommendations of Sept. 22, 2008 have been implemented, and
Whereas, the Bush Administration/Paulson bailouts have not forced the banks to lend money or restricted the use of the tax dollar bailout; and
Whereas, Naomi Klein reports that, "The more details emerge, the clearer it becomes that Washington's handling of the Wall Street bailout is not merely incompetent. It is borderline criminal." And Congressman Barney Frank says, "The money is going to bonuses. It is going to shareholders. And it is not going to lending. This violates the (bailout) act;" and
Whereas, the most recent, but not the only, anti-worker impact of the financial crisis is the attempt to bust the United Auto Workers Union as a remedy for the failures of the big three auto companies -- as if the auto workers were at fault for the business decisions of the Wall St. owners of the auto industry, the impacts of a globalized automobile industry, and the impact of health-care costs on making U.S.-based auto production less than competitive or cost-efficient; and
Whereas, the Republicans and their media servants cry for dismantling UAW contracts and benefits, it is clear that universal single payer expansion of Medicare for All Americans will relieve employers of being the main supplier of health care, while enabling workers to have portable universal access to care; and
Whereas, after the $290 billion that has been given away to the bankers, Secretary of Treasury Paulson has earmarked $410 billion for the new President to administer; and
Whereas, John Sweeney has stated that, "[W]orking people need an economic recovery package that will jump-start the economy and put America back to work. ... We need an immediate investment plan to create jobs by rebuilding our crumbling roads and schools and bridges;" andWhereas, while the banking and globalizing economic forces are gathering around the new administration to support Wall Street, the AFL-CIO has called for action to aid and benefit Main Street; and
Whereas, the current situation requires thoughtful and coordinated action by labor if we are to achieve real support for the working class; and
Whereas, even the new president cannot move this mountain of embedded corruption and greed without overwhelming pressure from those of us who elected him.
Therefore, the SFLC shall establish an ad-hoc Economic Crisis Committee to evaluate and recommend to the Council an action program of specific remedies and policies to also convey to the State Federation of Labor, the AFL-CIO and CTW regarding the ongoing theft of tax payer dollars and the continuing decline of workers' well-being; and
Be it further resolved, that this Economic Crisis Committee shall provide a preliminary report to the Council as soon as possible or by the time of the first 2009 meeting of the delegates on January 12, 2009, in order to be prepared to powerfully communicate our concerns and perspective to the new incoming President Barack Obama.Subject to the Committee's work, here are some proposed demands that probably should be included in such a plan. Proposals for direct action or legislative action to back up such demands and not noted here:

(1) Put a halt to the Paulson bailout plan. No more money to bail out Wall Street. Bail out working people. Use all the remaining $410 billion for the people.

(2) Repeal the Bush tax cuts given the wealthy 1% of the population and the transnational corporations. Do not extend the tax cuts. Strictly regulate the hedge fund, sub-prime and other derivatives' markets. Re-establish the firewalls between banking, insurance and investment industries.

(3) Enact a moratorium on all home foreclosures, utility shut-offs, evictions and rent hikes for owner and tenant occupied units.

(4) Enact the Employee Free Choice Act so that every worker can choose to have union representation.

(5) Enact a universal, single-payer healthcare plan, specifically HR 676 expanding Medicare to all Americans.

(6) Enact a massive national reconstruction public works program to rebuild the nation's schools, hospitals and crumbling infrastructure and to put millions of people back to work, with a prevailing wage, including all necessary funding for a genuine Reconstruction program in the Gulf Coast. Launch a national program of building housing and schools, community clinics and community recreation facilities, in working class communities across the nation..

(7) Stop the union-busting in auto, and halt all layoffs in auto and other industries across the country, and prohibit the transfer of manufacturing and service jobs overseas. Build ecological sustainable industries in the U.S., whether it is by converting existing industries or building new ones. Put the American working class back to productive work. We need a new New Deal. Impose a moratorium on all "Free Trade" agreements.

(8) End the war and occupation of Iraq and get the troops and the private military contractors out of Iraq now. Redirect the war funding to meet human needs.(9) Stop the ICE raids and deportations on immigrant workers.

Respectully submitted,

Denis Mosgofian, GCC-IBT 4N
Alan Benjamin, OPEIU 3
Tom Edminster, UESF(organizations for identification)
Adopted by the SFLC Delegate Body November 24, 2008

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Whoa is my union…

Hey fellow UAW members, did you hear our fearless leader on the Rachel Maddow show tonight. What the hell!!! He spent most of the interview defending the criminal management of the big three! And than he goes on to describe the current products of the U.S. auto industry as if they represented the green technology of the future! WHAT!!!

My god, no wonder our union is in such trouble. Compare Mr. Gettelfinger’s lame defense of the bosses with Michael Moore’s righteous indignation which I discussed in my last post. Come on man! Don’t you see by now that sucking up to management is not going to save the U.S. auto worker. You should be demanding that the Congress pass a bailout that includes those guys complete removal. Hell, you should be asking for the plants to be turned over to the workers, but I am not holding my breath on that one. Come on, get a freaking backbone for once. First you lay-down and let management walk all over the union in the last round on contract negotiations, than you bet the future of the auto workers on defending a failed industry management.

At least Maddow had some sense and pointed out the obvious – that most of the opposition to the bailout from the right is nothing but union busting. But Gettelfinger didn’t even run with that softball. WE HAVE GOT TO CHANGE THE UAW LEADERSHIP IF OUR UNION IS TO SURVIVE!

Here is a link to the interview…

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#27917562

Tune in to this Sunday’s Labor Express Radio program for discussion of the needed auto industry bailout from a REAL leader in the UAW, Frank Hammer. You can also read a statement issued by Hammer here…

http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=46317

Here is an even more extensive response from friend Dan LaBotz…

http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/labotz251108.html

Sunday, November 23, 2008

The end of Capitalism as we know it?

Leave it to Michael Moore to put the eminent demise of the U.S. Auto industry and the general economic crisis in general in the proper context. On Larry King Live tonight, Moore responded with total disgust to the sight of the CEO’s of the big three U.S. auto makers begging Congress for bailout funds… “What we are seeing here right now, with them, with the banks, we seeing the end of capitalism, the end of capitalism as we know it, and I say good riddance. It hasn’t help the people or the planet.”

While Michael’s forecast of the collapse of capitalism might be a bit premature, you can’t but totally agree with the sentiment of his words. Moore also has some interesting advice for the Congress as they consider a bailout for the big three. In particular I like his suggestion that the factories be re-focused on building mass transit vehicles. Moore comes the closest that I have seen yet in calling for the real short term answer to the auto industry – nationalization and workers control. Hey, we already bought AIG, I would much rather we use our tax money to take over some of the most important productive property in this country.

You can view Moore’s full interview here…

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/11/20/lkl.michael.moore.bailout.cnn

An agenda for Obama's first hundred days...

Hi pilsenprole readers,

I apologize for such a long break from my previous entry, especially given the importance of the just past election. I have been quite ill over the past few weeks and it has really slowed me down. I will post my own reflections on the election within the next couple days.

In the meantime, I encourage you to read this article by Bill Fletcher Jr. Fletcher is the author of the recently published book Solidarity Divided: The Crisis in Organized Labor and a New Path toward Social Justice, an excellent analysis of the current state of the labor movement in the United States (I encourage all of you to buy a copy). He is also the former President of the TransAfrica Forum and the former Director of Education for the AFL-CIO. He is one of the founders of the Center for Labor Renewal.

Fletcher provides a well thought-out plan for Obama’s first hundred days…
http://www.centerforlaborrenewal.org/?P=A&Category_ID=25&Article=229&PHPSESSID=9e495a97f476e18bed3c0a559b3c3572